Friday, March 22, 2019

The Appalling Leadership of King Henry V :: European Literature

In enthalpy V, the actions of powerfulness total heat portray him as an appalling leader. Among hydrogens many negative traits, he allows himself to be influenced by people who nominate anterior motives. This is problematic because the decisions energy not be the best decisions for the country, or neighboring countries. The bishops convinced enthalpy to make for over France because they would be able to save land for the Church. Henry doesnt learn the ability to accept responsibility for his actions, placing the blame on others. in the lead Henry begins to take over a French village, he tells the regulator to surrender or risk having English troops terrorize civilians. This way, if the regulator declines, it would be the governors fault for the atrocities that would occur. Henry has gotten his troops to go along with the take over by manipulating them. He tells the soldiers that what theyre doing is noble, and that they should be proud. In fact, theyre attacking another(pren ominal) country in order to conquer it. Henrys character comes off as coldhearted and careless. Henry shows ruthlessness towards civilians, threatening them with atrocities. Hes careless with his soldiers, thoughtlessly allowing their executions, or playing hurtful games with them. France putsch is mostly due to Henrys accepting advice from the bishops who had a motive for their judgment. In Act 1, Scene 1, Henry is promised a king-size sum of money by the Church to help fund his takeover of France. In order for Henry to receive the money he would lose to vote against a certain bill that the bishops, Ely and Canterbury find obstructive to the Church. Soon, Henry goes to Ely and Canterbury to help him decide whether its alright for him to take over France under Salic law. Clearly, Ely, and Canterbury would have a good reason to suggest Henry take France since he would have to accept the Churchs money, and thus vote against the bill. Canterbury tells Henry he should watch over the take over arguing that it is illegal for France to use the Salic law since it originated in Germany. As well, he argues that the manner in which previous French kings have claimed the throne would have been in violation of the law. So with this argument Henry decides to go ahead with taking over France. The problem is that Henrys decision was cause by a goal of the Church. A decision that holds thousands of lives at risk is decided on so one group of people could benefit.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.