Language and Culture in an Immigrant Society :: Cultural Identity Essays

The professor of my linguistics anthropology course this year, stepped up to the podium on the first gear day of class, and surprised us all with his feelings regarding linguistic process. He began by telling us that he specializes in human misery, perhaps insinuating voice communication is a source of misery. Dr. Song is a Korean immigrant and the sounds of his own style repulses him. Growing up in modern society America has make him cringe at the sound of his native tongue. It is this same native language of Korean that my professor falls back into when he is made flyaway by an English speaking person leaning in appressed to him and squinting up his face expecting not to understand what will baffle out of his mouth before he even opens it. It is as if the defeat and impatience he has confronted in people has fostered a hatred for the crack up of him that is foreign.   Michael agar-agar, a leading theorist on modern linguistics, has proposed a designer for this regression. In looking at the elusive idea of culture we compute that the content is ever changing. It is a continual process iodin that Agar hypothesizes is not something those people have its something that happens to you. My professor partd an example of dickens types of drivers to demonstrate the different reactions to the complications that arise with culture. These two drivers will be called the first and second driver. The first driver embodies the number one type and the second, the favourable driver. He uses the situation of traffic congestion to put these types into perspective. Imagine a driver during traffic congestion. The number one type will say to himself, The system is causing this inconvenience, because it is always like this. To a number one type, it is this immutable truth that is the cause of any obstacles. This truth can be applied to almost anything in a society where we are environ by reproducible images and experiences, which grants permission to use stereotypes. The problem (the traffic congestion) is caused by a thing out there and is objectified.   But there is a second driver, the good driver. This driver does not objectify the situation and use the accepted truth.